![]() ![]() It provides a simple number indicating the performance (the higher, the better). Does include a CPU bench and OpenGL bench, but only the CPU one is used here. CINEBENCH r15: A benchmark based on a raytracing engine.Measures will be done on the 1st Tutorial screen, while the game is paused. FTL: that I added to the bench after doing the QEMU measures.Measures will be done on the Title screen. WorldOfGoo: The game has simple graphics, it should run fine.The fps will simply be measured with `HUD_GALLIUM=fps` on a stable and reproducible moment in the game: I’ll also do some quick bench not available natively. The 7z, dav1d and glmark2 bench are described here, and the openarena one there. openarena, that contains x87 code, and a JIT, and, in that config, is very much GPU limited, and so should be running very close to the native speed (again, as long as GL is still hardware accelerated).I couldn’t install the armhf version of glmark2 on Ubuntu, so only the native 64bits version was benchmarked. glmark2 that is GL limited and should run at mostly native speed (as long as GL is hardware accelerated).dav1d, an opensource video transcoding tool, that includes hand-optimized SSE assembly code (SSE3 or more).The version 16 present in Ubuntu was used for those tests. 7-zip integrated benchmark, that contains mostly integer code (no x87 or SSE), and can be used as a baseline to see the pure x86 code translation efficiency.Test will consist of the bench I already used a couple of time, and that can be run as native or emulated: There are QEMU-user, FEX-emu and Box86/ Bo圆4. This may, for example, indicate that mem_ptr is a 32-bit pointer which is fine on a 32-bit system but needs to be a 64-bit pointer on a 64-bit system.I decided to compare the performances of the OpenSource Linux Userspace Emulator that allows you to run x86/x86_64 apps on ARM linux. Without access to your source code it's difficult to see what the problem is but a segmenation fault indicates that an attempt has been made to access memory that does not belong to the program. Many programmers make assumptions about the system that may not be true: such as register width or byte order. Well written code for a 32-bit system should compile and run on a 64-bit system but not all code is well written. Assuming your C file is myfile.c try gcc -S myfile.c on both systems and compare myfile.s You can prove this by compiling to assembly code on the two systems. Though there is no guarantee that 64-bit code will run faster if the code has not been written to take advantage of the extra features of the processor.Ĭompiling on a 32-bit system will produce different code than a 64-bit system. The cores in modern PCs are capable of behaving as either a 64-bit or a 32-bit processor depending on which version of the operating system you have installed.Ħ4-bit code tends to run faster than 32-bit code either because it can deal with bigger numbers in on go or because the 64-bit cores have more registers so can store more things without needing to put things in external memory. This is the width (in bits) of registers available in the core.īasically the largest number that a 32-bit CPU core can handle in one go is a little over 4.29 billion while a 64-bit core can handle a number of a bit over 18.44 billion, billion. The difference between amd64 and i386 is that amd64 is 64-bit while i386 is 32-bit. Regardless, the world has shifted from 32 bit and it's only there to support older machines that are incapable of running 64 bit. For Linux, however, there's no such limit (thanks, Uri). You'd need to use a 64-bit OS in order to fully use all RAM. In the Windows world, a 32-bit OS will not let you use more than 3.5 Gigs of RAM on your computer (even if you have 8!). For the most part you will not notice a difference but for large workloads (such as video editing, gaming, etc), the computer will perform faster (the computer has the ability to calculate 2+2+2=6 instead of having to do 2+2=4+2=6 in an example). x86-64 is still used by many in the industry as a vendor-neutral term, while others, notably Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) and Microsoft, use 圆4.Įven if you have an intel CPU, you should use AMD64 to install 64-bit on your computer (it uses the same instruction sets). After launching the architecture under the "x86-64" name, AMD renamed it AMD64. It supports vastly larger virtual and physical address spaces than are possible on x86, thereby allowing programmers to conveniently work with much larger data sets. X86-64 is an extension of the x86 instruction set. ![]() This is termed x86, IA-32, or the i386-architecture, depending on context. The Intel 80386, also known as the i386, or just 386, was a 32-bit microprocessor introduced by Intel in 1985. I386 refers to the 32-bit edition and amd64 (or x86_64) refers to the 64-bit edition for Intel and AMD processors. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |